Free Trade,
according to New Oxford American Dictionary, is “international trade left to
its natural course without tariffs, quotas, or other restrictions”. What a brilliant concept! It came as quite the surprise to me to learn
that there were actual products that could be and actually are purchased
between countries that have no added amount (tariffs) attached to it. Of course there are benefits to having free
trade and there are drawbacks as well.
It simply depends on which side of the trade you are on, and in all
honesty, whether or not you live in America.
Free trade allows us to exchange product for the value that it is at,
and sell it as such. Whenever we place
barriers between us and other countries, no good ever comes of it. There are products and designs that would
take us years to think up, whereas other countries create it in a few short
months; and vice versa.
The basic concept
of a sports team applies well to the concept of free trade. If a team member were willing to give more
than they take, they would be considered a ‘team player’. Even if a team member practices for hours
every day to improve their game but isolate himself or herself when practicing
with the team and refuse to depend upon others’ skills, they will contribute
nothing to the game they are so fond of.
So it is with Free Trade. Every
individual has the capacity to donate something to the world. If they are unwilling to share, or those
receiving are unwilling to receive all due to minute and insignificant details,
(usually as a result of selfishness and greed) the world would not
progress. We would be stagnant, and so
would every other continent on the planet.
The moment we begin trading amongst one another and do it freely, we
progress and ideas build upon others’ ideas.
However, this
brings us to another point that could be a downside to the concept of Free
Trade. When jobs are being sent from the
United States to other countries to be more efficient, suddenly the United
States’ economy suffers; jobs are lost, and people no longer have the ability
to contribute. There are many more
perspectives and angles that ought to be looked at when considering Free
Trade. All in all, the ability to trade freely
between countries and share ideas is beneficial to nearly everyone involved.
As previously discussed,
Globalization can be broken down into 3 parts : Globalization 1, 2 and 3. In Globalization 1 “countries had to think globally”, then in 2, “companies had to think globally”, and in 3, “individuals had to think globally” (Friedman 278). Simply put, individuals have to be concerned
more with themselves and their fitting into the world (not just their family or
community) now. In order to fit in and
thrive they must find the new middle. To
continue doing what ‘old timers’ have always done will bring little to no success. New middlers include ‘The Untouchables’ and ‘The
Greats’. Untouchable persons are those
whose jobs are nearly forever secure. They
have the prime situation-they are the heads of businesses and the famous
individuals we hear about in the news. ‘The
Greats’ are individuals who succeed in their area of expertise simply because
of their talents and drive. In order to
ever feel secure globally it would be wise to become one of these
individuals. Getting there is quite the
feat though.
The equation
CQ+PQ=IQ would be of great benefit for anyone striving to feel the security
previously talked about. CQ (curiosity
quotient) and PQ (passion quotient) are more important to society today than
IQ. If a child has curiosity and
passion, they can accomplish nearly anything they put their mind to. My husband is the perfect example of
this. While driving in the car he speaks
of nearly anything and everything we are passing by, things that, to a
‘regular’ person, would be quite boring.
It is truly a talent to turn something that seems common in the world
into something fascinating and fantastic.
Desire and curiosity are main players in the rising generation’s success;
they require diligence and hard work. In
a flat world, those two qualities are becoming more costly than gold.
No comments:
Post a Comment