Some countries are
better at doing things than other countries; true. Why? Because countries are composed of
individuals. Individuals have their own
talents, skills, weaknesses, and strengths.
When you combine all of these elements together, what do you get? A sum total of every angle of every individual
combined. This leaves the country with
its own overall total of talents, skills, weaknesses, and strengths. We have all experienced a change within
ourselves because of the influence of another individual whom we are closely
associated with- whether it be a neighbor, friend, or especially family
member. This is how a culture is
formed. A group of people slowly meshes
together and becomes quite similar.
Granted, they are still individuals and remain distinct, but when looked
at as an overall whole it is easy to decipher what talents and skills they
have. In the case of Friedman’s “The
World is Flat” he frankly states that, “every region of the world has its strengths
and weaknesses…(Friedman 412).”
What an
interesting principle to try to understand!
Every country contributes to the growth and development of the world in
its technical advancements, ideology, medicine/health improvements and
findings, education, and so forth.
Because of each country’s “specialties” we can all benefit. However, it is also easy to discern the
weaknesses of each country as well (we have become quite good at it,
sadly). When we focus on the strengths
and resources we each have (just as we are taught in our homes as individuals)
everyone prospers.
The next major
issue that has come from the flattening of the world is whether or not
globalization equals Americanization. There
are, as always two sides to the debate.
Many have feared that because America has such a large influence on the
rest of the world that rather than being distinct, as talked about before, we
would all slowly morph into one mass American-influenced society. What a boring, unproductive, and unsuccessful
world we would live in if this were the case!
However, many fail
to observe the positive influence the Internet has on this issue. The ability to upload presents the opportunity
for individuals all around the world to share their culture-meaning their “native
dress, native cuisine, native music, and extended family-all the things that
make up a native culture (Friedman 479).” I have just recently begun noticing the American
style change towards more European and even Indian styles! Culottes,
a very Indian-based style of pant has become quite popular. Not quite as recent are the European recipes
that are extremely posh. There are many
examples of the positive effects globalization has had on the world, and it has
not meant in any form that Americanization has been the result. These styles, recipes, etc. have been a
direct result of individuals placing their culture on the web where anyone and
everyone can learn and then apply them into their own lives, halfway across the
world.
After
studying this section my understanding of self-directed consumers is that when
one sees a need, they fill the need. If
a product is not created or ones’ way of life is not ‘up to par’ they do
something about it. This is the world we
live in today, hard work and imagination truly do get you places and what is
even greater are the resources available today to provide entrepreneurship. I would not consider myself a self-directed
consumer. I often see needs, but do not
even scratch the surface of all that is available literally at my
fingertips. However, this book has begun
helping me change towards becoming a self-directed entrepreneur. If the opportunity to improve life is
available, do it!